AS 75 Arsenic Test KitDIANE Publishing |
Expressions et termes fréquents
0.1 Laboratory RB 75 Arsenic Test 75 test according to Equation analytical results arsenic concentrations assess associated QC samples audit Battelle bias calculated according calculation of bias calibration color chart detection limit drinking water samples DW LFMF Environmental Technology Verification false negative false positive filter holder FW samples Laboratory Performance Test LC-4 Duplicate levels of interferences linear regression Little Beaver Creek Lytle Creek measure arsenic Method Detection Limit N N N Non-detect Non-Technical Arsenic ppb non-technical operator operator bias PeCo test PeCo test kit Percent bias calculated Performance Test Samples ppb of arsenic Prepared arsenic solution PT samples Range Y/N Rate of False reference analyses Reference Method Results reference value replicate analyses replicate samples result within 25 Results from Laboratory samples were analyzed Section 5.1 shown in Table spiked standard Stillwater River Technical Arsenic ppb test kit results test/QA plan verification test Y Y Y
Fréquemment cités
Page iii - The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate...
Page iii - ETV consists of six environmental technology centers. Information about each of these centers can be found on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/etv/. Effective verifications of monitoring technologies are needed to assess environmental quality and to supply cost and performance data to select the most appropriate technology for that assessment. In 1997, through a competitive cooperative agreement, Battelle was awarded EPA funding and support to plan, coordinate, and conduct such verification tests...
Page 12 - PE sample analysis was within the required range. Table 4-4. Reference Method PE Audit Results 4.2.2 Technical Systems Audit...
Page 2 - Chapter 2 Technology Description The objective of the ETV AMS Center is to verify the performance characteristics of environmental monitoring technologies for air, water, and soil. This verification report provides results for the verification testing of the Quick™ Low Range II test kit for arsenic in water (Figure 2-1).
Page iii - Under the mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, the EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD) provides data and science support that can be used to solve environmental problems and to build the scientific knowledge base needed to manage our ecological resources wisely, to understand how pollutants...
Page 8 - ... desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions were extracted from the plasma through a pumped vacuum interface and separated on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio by a quadrupole mass spectrometer. The ions transmitted through the quadrupole were registered by a continuous dynode electron multiplier, and the ion information was processed by a data handling system. The ICPMS was tuned, optimized, and calibrated daily. The calibration was performed using a minimum of five calibration...
Page iii - Development provides data and science support that can be used to solve environmental problems and to build the scientific knowledge base needed to manage our ecological resources wisely, to understand how pollutants affect our health, and to prevent or reduce environmental risks. The Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program has been established by the EPA to verify the performance characteristics of innovative environmental technology across all media and to report this objective information...
Page 13 - Once the assessment report was prepared, the Battelle Verification Test Coordinator ensured that a response was provided for each adverse finding or potential problem and implemented any necessary follow-up corrective action. The Battelle Quality Manager ensured that follow-up corrective action was taken. The results of the TSA were sent to the EPA.
Page 13 - Battelle technical staff member involved in the verification test, but not the staff member that originally generated the record. The person performing the review added his/her initials and the date to a hard copy of the record being reviewed.
Page 13 - Manager reviewed the standards and methods used, compared actual test procedures to those specified in the test/QA plan, and reviewed data acquisition and handling procedures. Observations and findings from this audit were documented and submitted to the Verification Test Coordinator for response.